My Body, My Choice
Masks should not be mandatory and Asymptomatic Spread does not happen.
More Doctors Need to Stop the Lies
The Facts Don’t Lie, The Real Science and Numbers are really not that impressive.
The Truth about the Numbers and Erroneously Hyper-Inflated PCR Testing Results by Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi (Germany)
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg (Germany) On COVID19 Rates – COVID19 incidence is the same as common flu, health organizations make the mistake and measure case fatality rates which over count death rates, when the measurement that is important when determining how aggressive a virus is, is the excess death rate: that is, how many deaths are we measuring that are in excess of the normally measured fatalities regarding all diseases. When this more accurate measurement is done, we find the rates are the same as the common flu.
The Dangers and fatality rate of Draconian Lockdowns by Dr. Scott Atlas (USA)
Is SARS-CoV-2 Really more Deadly than the H2N2 Influenza Virus
aka The Asian Flu
Unreported Truths – COVID19
True Lies about the Death Counts
How did we get to this point?
Officials in State Health Departments were actually allowed to estimate counts when patients were seen in clinics, hospitals, and urgent care centers.
In March of this year, the official reporting centers, collecting the case numbers, made decisions that allowed the numbers to sky rocket; without requiring any laboratory evidence as proof to support the new rise in cases. They were allowed to count or tally 1 case as 4 or more cases depending upon the race of the patient being treated or seen in a doctors office.
Their reasoning – if a white person was being evaluated, and they thought they may have COVID19, thought to be due to SARS–CoV-2, they tallied this as four cases because, statistically they are more likely living in a family of 4, and no lab testing is (was) ever required to substantiate this count.
They could have been having symptoms of just ordinary common cold symptoms which are seen in any flu season from one if these three viruses: the common cold coronaviruses, the influenza viruses, and the rhinoviruses.
These are the three most common viruses that make up virtually all the common cold viruses. These three common cold viruses have not simply disappeared in the face of the SARS–CoV-2 virus. People are still getting these as they have been for untold years.
If the patient was non-white, they were allowed to count the case even higher – even as high as 6 or more, because they were more likely to be residing in a larger household. No laboratory tests were required and even today are not required. So the numbers are necessarily much less that are actually being recorded as seen on the Johns Hopkins website that everyone refers to.
Recently, when blood bank samples from several collection centers were collected from donations prior to 2019 and tested to the SARS–CoV-2 virus that causes COVID19, 50-60% of the samples tested positive for the SARS–CoV-2 virus – which means even, if you do test positive for COVID19, many people tested actually do not have the virus that causes COVID19 disease, but actually the common cold virus; not SARS–CoV-2.
Even the CDC admitted their case rates and fatality rates are probably as much as 4-5 times the actual rates, because of the fact of all these over-reporting and miss-reporting of various illnesses that were never really COVID19 related.
Bottom line, the masks, lock-downs, school closures, church closures, social distancing… virtually everything supporting “the sky is falling” mentality, are not necessary, and have actually caused more harm than good; simply because this virus is not different that any of the past several “bad flu seasons”this country has sustained within the past several decades.
Understanding how the MSM has led you to believe that this cannot possibly be true because of all the people that are dying, one only has to rely on science and not people who don’t know what the numbers actually are.
Given that it’s difficult to get an accurate assessment as to the real case fatality rate, because we cannot possibly test everyone – (the denominator in the equation), and we are seeing miss-reporting in the actual deaths, the rates are going to be greatly over-counted (the numerator in the equation).
The most accurate scientific way to assess how may deaths are truly due to the COVID19 disease is to compare all the excess deaths given in an area a during a set annual amount of time, and relate that number to the amount of deaths in the same area, during the same amount of time in previous years, accounting for changes in population.
When this excess death analysis is done, we find the death rate to be about 0.5%-0.6% and maybe as high as 0.8%-1.2% in some areas such as NYC; being measured higher in the older patients. This is the same rate that we saw for the H2N2 influenza strain which accounted for about 70-80K deaths in the US. A typical cold season usually results in about 60K deaths.
We also know that a different SARS–CoV-2 viral strain [strain L], seen early on was more lethal than the strain [strain S] that is presently spreading in our communities.
Since we never mandated such draconian lock-downs in the past with virus seasons with similar illnesses and mortality rates, one has to wonder why our legislators demanded that is be done for the SARS–CoV-2 that we are experiencing today.
One should also be concerned why our government allowed the larger box stores to remain open and the smaller stores were forced to close, resulting in many untold deaths of these smaller businesses; indeed logic would actually support a higher contagious rate in stores were more “virus spreaders” would be circulating.
The science simply is not here to support this idiocracy.
Science supports reasonable and common sense preventive measures: good hygiene (hand washing), staying at home is your are sick – allowing for people to work and children to attend school, and getting the vaccine if you are at high risk of significant morbidity and mortality and chose to get the vaccine.
It Takes an Outsider from the Outback to Lead the Way Back…
The Cure cannot be worse then the illness
The First Video from Wuhan Meant to Scare us to death about the Virus
Fake Cell Phone Video of a Man Pretending to Die from COVID19
Why Have We Responded This Way?
There exists an monumental monetary gain in listing COVID19 as a diagnosis whenever a patient is admitted to a hospital, and there is an additional incentive to insure that physicians be pressured into placing their patients on respirators, even when, in most cases, they would have done better off the machines and more aggressively managed as outpatients had they been started on the appropriate treatment sooner.
Routine garden variety pneumonia patients are reimbursed at a rate of $5,000 on average, but that amount was $13,000 more if the diagnosis of COVID19 is added to the chart, and if the patient is placed on a ventilator, that amount skyrockets up to $39,000 for every case.
Many patients, we have since learned, never needed to be placed on these machines, and in fact, did much better, when they were not paralyzed and placed on these machines for their management.
Sadly, if family members could be kept away from those undergoing these treatments, there could be no interference and no-one to realize that many of these patients were actually doing worse under these ill-fated treatments.
Special payment programs from the federal government also allowed for an additional 20% be paid for each claim when the diagnosis of COVID19 was attached to the claim, allowing for an another $8,000 for this patient; so doctors were mandated to include this diagnosis code, whether or not the patient really had a COVID19 illness. A whopping $47,000 is a huge incentive to keep this a Pandemic, even when the numbers revealed, this was nothing more than a bad flu season. [Source: HHS]
Since the time of the initial publication of this page, it has been discovered that some hospital were in fact reimbursed as much as $80,000 if the ICU patient had the diagnosis of COVID19. Testing for diseases could be the causes of the patients inpatient admission such as Influenza, or other respiratory diseases was not only not required, in many instances, it was prohibited.
One might think that these costs are really okay, because these amounts are needed to pay the staff, the doctors, and the hospitals for their overhead; but surprisingly, the incentive to lie even got more lucrative and seductive.
Because this was classified a Pandemic, Congress allowed for emergency funding to go directly to the states (not the hospitals) for Relief – of every COVID19 tally: to name a few:
California $145,000 per case
Hawaii $301,000 per case
Maine $260,000 per case
Maryland $120,000 per case
Virginia $201,000 per case
West Virginia $471,000 per case
Washington $58,000 per case
New Hampshire $201,000 per case
Texas $184,000 per case
DC $56,000 per case
With a deal this lucrative, who would ever argue for this “Pandemic” to end?
This astounding amount of money could only be available as long as the federal government as well as the individual states were in agreement that this was indeed a horrible once in a lifetime pandemic, and without these funds, they argued, the states would collapse under the immense obligation of providing the appropriate care, protection, and materials needed to prevent people from dying.
The only way anyone could ever think about getting away with all this money-grubbing and get away with it, is to maintain a high level of fear; otherwise, no-one with any horse sense should be buying these lies.
Straight from the Horses Mouth… Masks are Useless
The Numbers Explained
Regarding accurate case numbers
If we investigate statistics where there is no real incentive to lie about the actual case numbers, such as Europe, we find that the actual death rates are really only about 20% higher than a typical flu season, or about the same as we experienced in the last major outbreak in 2017 within the United States, and remarkably, there were no such lock-downs, mandated masks, school closures, or mass hysteria as we are seeing now.
In fact, the COVID19 death rate of people below the age of 40 is actually 50% lower than what we have seen from people getting the influenza virus.
The mainstay of treating this illness would have been far better if good doctors followed their teachings guided by experience and without the restrictions placed upon them by state and federal agencies, as well as local governing boards that actually prosecuted practitioners for treating patients with medications and treatments that they deemed harmful, when in fact, they are not.
Doctors who have and continue to manage and treat their patients as outpatients, since the “Pandemic” started, with no deaths.
Effective Treatment if Started Early
Hydroxychloroquine works; Why Are we being told it does not?
Effective Treatment When for COVID19 Disease
The Treatment our President received was based upon the MATH+ protocol, and very good results are seen with this protocol as well.
Again, most of the patients who contract the SARS–CoV-2 virus do not and will not ever develop any significant morbidity (COVID19 disease) and require no treatment. For the most part, treatment is initiated if and when the oxygen saturation drops below a value as mentioned in both the videos above.
This management, as in our Presidents case, can also include antiviral medications such as Remdesivir and a drug called Regeneron or REGN-COV2— a pair of two monoclonal antibodies used to help generate an immune response to COVID-19 that are available as pharmaceutical companies are producing agents that can “attack” the virus sooner in cases where one’s immune response to a virus may be slow to start such as our elderly population.
MATH+ Protocol Diagram
Download PDF Document of Math+ Protocol
THIS IS A STEROID RESPONSIVE DISEASE: HOWEVER, TIMING IS CRITICAL
Frontline Diagram of MATH+ Protocol and Management
Download PDF Frontline Protocol
The Danish Mask Study
Several months ago, a group of scientific clinicians attempted to publish the results of what was considered to be the largest double-armed study to determine the overall effectiveness of wearing a mask and the reduction of virus spread amongst those in the mask wearing arm of the study.
There were about 3000 participants in each group. When they submitted the results for publication, the scientific community prohibited them from publication, and really gave no reason why. It was rumored that the refusal was given, because they study revealed that masks were not effective, and this was not politically accepted by those who did not want these results to be released.
Just recently, the results were released, and after some restructuring of the conclusions, they results were released, and it was shown that mask use did not statistically offer any improvement in virus spread or virus reduction when compared to those who did not wear masks.
Only about 40-50 non infected people in either arm of the scientific study became infected. The world was ablaze with this realization.
Virtually all the studies published prior to the outbreak of the SARS Cov-2 virus also revealed no reduction in virus spread, but many in charge ignored these results, and made up reasons why not to believe these studies, none of them being true to science.
Many reasoned these studies examined only influenza, or the studies were too small, or they were flawed for other reasons, so mask use was mandated, in the face that science revealed they offered really no significant reduction in virus spread or protection.
Of these studies, however, they were able to show that the masks might prevent patients from touching their face and mucous membranes while wearing the masks, and it was thought that this was indeed helpful in preventing contact spread, but not aerosol spread.
As for the virus particle airborne spread, the masks did not offer any protection. The Danish study supported these findings.
More importantly though, the study also does not support the fact that the Ro (R naught) number of this virus is between 2-3; the data in this study supports that the Ro is over estimated. We have been told that this novel coronavirus is a very contagious virus, and spreads very quickly to close contacts.
Social distancing and mask mandates, school closures, travel restrictions, business lock downs were all necessary to keep the many thousands of people that were definitely going to die since this virus was so contagious.
Thanksgiving, and Christmas and all holidays, weddings should be cancelled.
How Contagious is SARS–CoV-2
Given that both arms of the Danish Study had about 3000 patients in each arm, one would expect with an Ro of 2-2.5 that the amount of patients that became infected with the SARS–CoV-2 virus would most likely be much higher, in the hundreds.
According to the chart, one infected person is likely to infect between 2-3 people around them. Regardless of mask effectiveness, the amount of spread should have been much higher in at least the unmasked group.
If we just monitored one patient at the beginning of the study and given a study test time of one month and an incubation period of 5.5 days for the SARS–CoV-2 virus, we would expect to see somewhere between 155 to 450 infections in this time period given an Ro of 2.5 to 3. In both groups, there were less than 50.
Given, the study did not test everyone that may have come into contact with of each the test subjects, unless these subjects secluded themselves in a basement and never came out, one would expect a higher number of conversions, assuming as was expected that the SARS–CoV-2 virus had already been established in the country, and as the test subjects were tested between May and June 2020, it is a safe assumption that this was indeed the case.
This may be helpful in revising the level of contagiousness of the SARS–CoV-2 virus, revising the number downward. This is indeed consistent in what we see when we make accurate measurements comparing the expected death counts with the excess death counts in Denmark.
Accurate measurements have resulted in calculated fatality rates for the SARS–CoV-2 virus of about 350-500 per 1,000,000 which is what we observe for deaths from other viruses in a typical flu season, with fatality rates being weighted more in the older generation. In the younger ages, we do not see any significant morbidity or mortality.
Indeed, this is what we observe with patients that contract influenza like illnesses. The case fatality rates for the SARS–CoV-2 virus is actually 40% lower than what is observed with the influenza virus in patients under 40 years.
With these facts in hand, it is clear that mandated school closures, lock downs, mask mandates, business closures have had no significant preventive effect in either reducing the spread of the SARS–CoV-2 virus and no reduction in the case fatality rates.
Regarding the vaccine development and deployment, we should follow the same medical advice we would follow for the flu vaccine. High risk and elderly patients are more likely to benefit from the vaccine, but to mandate it for everyone for the sole purpose of protecting the same elderly and high risk patients, is not scientifically sound advice.
We are dealing with vaccines that maybe 90% effective for a virus that has about a 99.5% or greater survival rate, with the highest mortality seen in our elderly population; which is what we observe for the common cold viruses.
High risk and elderly patients are at risk for both the influenza and the SARS–CoV-2 viruses. We don’t mandate that everyone get the flu vaccine, and it does not make good medical sense for us to do the same for the SARS–CoV-2 virus for the same reason, simply because the SARS–CoV-2 virus has been shown not to be as deadly as the media and the pseudo-scientific world would have you believe.
Sadly many businesses have shut down and have closed permanently. School children are failing and much higher rates.
The short and long term psychological effects of school closures have resulted in increasing childhood depression, suicide, sexual, and physical abuse.
We have known all along that schools should have never been forced to stay closed, yet they were, and for the worst reasons – amazing, it has now been exposed – after the election – Fauci was never correct and he knew it at the time.
There is no scientific evidence to support any school closing or limited school closing, and to keep schools from operating normally is causing more damage than any harm resulting from the virus. One has to wonder what the ultimate motivation for our elected leaders is to keep our schools closed. It has been suggested that the states and unions are using the closures as leverage to get more money to cover ill-advised investments and for increased benefits for those involved with our teachers unions and state run organizations demanding increased funding for spurious reasons have little or nothing to do with the schools operating costs. This can easily be recognized as many of our private schools, if not all, are thriving without any problems or ill effects from the coronavirus to the children or staff at these institutions.
Children don’t get sick and don’t spread the virus to their teachers. We have known this for months. We know now that if you test positive for the virus via PCR test and you are asymptomatic, you are not going to spread the virus.
Alcohol and physical abuse has increased with lock downs and adult patients are not able to receive the medical and mental health they so desperately need, as many doctors and practitioners have either closed their doors or greatly reduced their patient visits.
We have reacted to this virus in such a manner, whereby the treatment – that is, our reaction – has been far worse than the disease.
Another Fine Mess
Untold Truths and Spoken Lies
Some words about my Mask…
There is no scientific support for the cloth masks preventing viral spread. There is no scientific support for the 6 foot social distance rule to prevent viral spread. There is no scientific support for plexiglass barriers preventing viral spread.
The windshield type face shields may prevent someone from spitting in your face, but offers no barrier for stopping viral spread in the way they want you to believe. So, those stores that substitute a shield for a mask is useless in anyway from stopping any small particle virus spread in either direction -they are as useless as masks. They are sometimes used in the operating room to prevent the surgeon and staff from coughing or sneezing into an open surgical field, or preventing a bleeder from spurting into someone’s face. Beyond that, they are making many companies very happy in their increased sales for this fake COVID19 pandemic.
This is how you are required to protect yourself from a true level 4 viral threat:
Note: No cloth masks
Or:
Fauci, himself does not don these suits, and in fact, his actions speak volumes, as he knows the uselessness of masks, as he dose not even himself wear them even when he orders others to do so.
No Mask; he admits they are useless.
Where is the mask gestapo? He gets a break, but many others get sent to jail for standing up for the same rights Dr. Fauci enjoy’s when he refuses to wear a mask.
People arrested for not wearing a mask. Sadly, these people do not have the political clout to flout the rules.
Why Did We Succumb to Draconian Executive Orders and Tyrannical Mandates that Violated Our Constitution?
Our political leaders backed by bought and paid for pseudo-scientific hacks scared everyone into believing that we would have millions dying in our hospitals unless we did exactly what they said: close all businesses, close all schools, close our government offices, wear a mask, even when alone, wear two masks, even when alone, keep 6 feet apart, no matter what…
Why did we believe that the virus was not a threat in our giant chain stores and businesses like Walmart, Costco, Lowes, Home Depot… but the smaller usually family owned stores had to be shut down because the virus would kill your more dead there than in Walmart? Stands to reason, that the larger stores with more people and potentially more “spreaders”would obviously pose a greater risk; but this was never argued for. Why?
Instead of trying to prove to you that the majority of our Nations’ ignorant citizens have been fooled, all you need to do is look at the states, where the governors mandated no such lock-downs and issued no executive orders that violated their liberty and freedom, and realize their actual deaths due to SARS-CoV-2 virus was no greater than the states with the most stringent mandates. In fact, their deaths were actually lower.
South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem Liberty and the Pandemic
Dr Fauci: Masks are Not helpful.
You need to do your own research if you do not believe what you are reading. As it now stands, we are not following good science.
Lock-downs and School closures are useless and not needed, and actually have caused more damage and deaths than the actual virus.
Masks are useless.
Social distancing rules are useless.
The plexiglass shields are useless.
Face shields are useless.
The CDC admits their viral counts are greatly exaggerated.
We have witnessed two prior episodes in history when two much more lethal coronaviruses entered the US:
SARS-CoV-1 in 2003 with 50% mortality from China
MERS-CoV in 2014 with 30-75% mortality from the middle east.
In both instances, there was no order for lock-downs, masks, social distancing or school closures.
COVID19 has a mortality of less than 0.01%, not even close to the rates we witnessed with the two other coronaviruses that entered the US in 2003 and 2014, and yet now, with a virus that is no more virulent than the common cold, we have forced lock-downs, school closures, masks, social distancing.
Why?
